First published in 1726, Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels remains at once an adventure story, a political satire, a philosophical provocation and a work that changed the visual imagination of generations of readers.

More than a story about little people

Swift used impossible voyages to expose very real human behaviour. The book examines politics, war, science, pride, colonialism, education and the instability of supposedly civilized society.

01

Literature

One of the most influential prose satires in the English language, repeatedly adapted, abridged, translated and reimagined.

02

Politics

Lilliput's ceremonies, factions and wars reduce political grandeur to absurdity and reveal the pettiness beneath public power.

03

Language

Words such as “Lilliputian” and “Yahoo” escaped the novel and entered ordinary speech.

04

Visual culture

The image of Gulliver tied to the ground became more widely remembered than many details of the text itself.

The most famous image in Gulliver's Travels did not appear in the first edition.

From text to image

1726

First publication

Benjamin Motte publishes the original London edition. It contains a portrait, maps and a diagram, but no narrative illustrations of Gulliver's adventures.

1727

The Hague

French and Dutch translations appear with the earliest full-page copperplate illustrations.

1727

Paris

A different visual tradition presents Gulliver at a slightly later moment in the same episode.

1727/28

London

Motte's illustrated English edition uses one plate to combine several moments into a vertical visual narrative.

Three early visual traditions

The Hague 1727 engraving showing Gulliver bound by the Lilliputians

Full image on the left with inset zoom in on the right.

Edition 01

The Hague

1727 · The earliest illustrated Gulliver

The French and Dutch editions published in The Hague shared a set of four unsigned copperplates, one for each voyage. In the first plate Gulliver lies on the ground, apparently still asleep, while the Lilliputians climb ladders and continue the process of securing him.

The image does more than illustrate one instant. The city previews Gulliver's destination, while the ship, overturned boat, paddle and swimmer in the distance visually explain how he arrived.

  • Gulliver Eyes closed; still being restrained.
  • Foreground Hat, armed Lilliputians and ladders.
  • Distance City, coastline, ship and traces of the wreck.
  • Visual method Past, present and future compressed into one landscape.
London 1727 or 1728 engraving combining three scenes from Gulliver's captivity in Lilliput

Full image on the left with inset zoom in on the right.

Edition 03

London

Dated 1727 · Probably issued in 1728

Benjamin Motte's illustrated English edition differs most dramatically. Rather than concentrating on one landscape, its first plate combines three distinct episodes in a tall, planar sequence.

At the bottom Gulliver is fed while still bound. In the middle he is transported toward the metropolis on a wheeled carriage. At the top he sits chained beside the ancient temple as the emperor approaches.

  • Lower scene Gulliver fed by the Lilliputians.
  • Middle scene Transport on the enormous carriage.
  • Upper scene The temple, city and approaching emperor.
  • Visual method Three moments arranged vertically like a storyboard.

The same story, three different moments

Feature The Hague Paris London
Gulliver's state Asleep or not yet awake Awake and partly free Shown across several later episodes
Composition Deep landscape Sea, captive and city in three layers Three stacked narrative scenes
Shipwreck Ship, boat, paddle and swimmer visible Sea present, but no detailed wreck Not the main subject
City Previewed in the distance Prominent behind Gulliver Appears in the upper scene
Lasting contribution Established the captive image Reinterpreted its narrative timing Turned the episode into a sequence

More Gulliver, but not by Swift

The displayed Hague copy is bound with an additional volume of supposed voyages, including a second voyage to Brobdingnag and a journey to Sevarambia. These were not written by Jonathan Swift.

The volume reflects the speed with which publishers attempted to profit from the extraordinary success of Gulliver's Travels. By attaching invented adventures to the genuine work, the publishers created an early example of unauthorized literary continuation, commercial imitation and bibliographical confusion.

A ship from Gulliver's world

Beside the books is a hand-built scale model of a British warship representing a vessel of the late seventeenth or early eighteenth century. The model itself is old and was probably made by hand during the nineteenth century.

To us it is a small model. To an inhabitant of Lilliput, however, it would appear to be a full-sized warship. Its masts, guns, rigging and hull would possess the same overwhelming scale that Gulliver possessed when he first lay on the shore.

The ship therefore joins the engravings as an interpretive object. The images show us how early artists pictured Gulliver. The model asks us to reverse the perspective and imagine how the Lilliputians might have pictured his world.

Imagine...

You are standing on the shore of Lilliput. A vessel like this appears beyond the harbour. It is not a model. It is a towering machine built by giants from somewhere beyond the horizon.

Hand-built nineteenth-century scale model of a late seventeenth or early eighteenth-century British warship

A 19th Century wooden handmade model of a 17th Century British Battleship

The engravings taught generations what Gulliver looked like. The ship model invites us to imagine what the world looked like through the eyes of the Lilliputians.
Three Hundred Years of Gulliver's Travels

Sources and acknowledgements

  1. Russell Palmer, “Illustrating Gulliver and the Lilliputians in 1727 and 1728,” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews, vol. 34, no. 4, 2021, pp. 311–318.
  2. Jonathan Swift, Gulliver's Travels, first published by Benjamin Motte in London in 1726.
  3. Bibliographical information concerning the Hague copy and its additional spurious volume has been compared with antiquarian descriptions and standard Swift bibliography.
  4. Interpretation of the displayed ship is based on its physical form and apparent age. Its precise maker and date remain under research.
Back to top ↑